Oregon International Commercial Arbitration and Conciliation Act
    This act applies to the conduct of arbitrations in Oregon involving transactions with an international connection.  

    It makes provision for Oregon courts to provide assistance to arbitrations involving international matters where the arbitration is being conducted elsewhere.

    Finally, it makes provision for enforcement of arbitration awards from foreign countries.  However, the substance of the law relating to enforcement of awards from foreign countries is probably pre-empted by the federal International Arbitration Act and the New York Convention, so this Oregon Act is probably limited to enforcement of foreign arbitration awards that would not be enforceable under federal law for some reason.

OREGON INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT

36.450 Definitions for ORS 36.450 to 36.558
.
    For the purposes of ORS 36.450 to 36.558:
    (1) “Arbitral award” means any decision of the arbitral tribunal on the substance of the dispute submitted to it and includes any interim, interlocutory or partial arbitral award.
    (2) “Arbitral tribunal” means a sole arbitrator or a panel of arbitrators.
    (3) “Arbitration” means any arbitration whether or not administered by a permanent arbitral institution.
    (4) “Arbitration agreement” means an agreement by the parties to submit to arbitration all or certain disputes which may arise between them in respect to a defined legal relationship, whether contractual or not. An arbitration agreement may be in the form of an arbitration clause in a contract or in the form of a separate agreement.
    (5) “Commercial” means matters arising from all relationships of a commercial nature including, but not limited to, any of the following transactions:
        (a) A transaction for the supply or exchange of goods or services.
        (b) A distribution agreement.
        (c) A commercial representation or agency.
        (d) An exploitation agreement or concession.
        (e) A joint venture or other forms of industrial or business cooperation.
        (f) The carriage of goods or passengers by air, sea, rail or road.
        (g) Construction.
        (h) Insurance.
        (i) Licensing.
        (j) Factoring.
        (k) Leasing.
        (L) Consulting.
        (m) Engineering.
        (n) Financing.
        (o) Banking.
        (p) The transfer of data or technology.
        (q) Intellectual or industrial property, including trademarks, patents, copyrights and software programs.
        (r) Professional services.
    (6) “Conciliation” means any conciliation whether or not administered by a permanent conciliation institution.
    (7) “Chief Justice” means the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Oregon or designee.
    (8) “Circuit court” means the circuit court in the county in this state selected as pursuant to ORS 36.464.
    (9) “Court” means a body or an organ of the judicial system of a state or country.
    (10) “Party” means a party to an arbitration or conciliation agreement.
    (11) “Supreme Court” means the Supreme Court of Oregon.

36.452 Policy.
    (1) It is the policy of the Legislative Assembly to encourage the use of arbitration and conciliation to resolve disputes arising out of international relationships and to assure access to the courts of this state for legal proceedings ancillary to or otherwise in aid of such arbitration and conciliation and to encourage the participation and use of Oregon facilities and resources to carry out the purposes of ORS 36.450 to 36.558.
    (2) Any person may enter into a written agreement to arbitrate or conciliate any existing dispute or any dispute arising thereafter between that person and another. If the dispute is within the scope of ORS 36.450 to 36.558, the agreement shall be enforced by the courts of this state in accordance with ORS 36.450 to 36.558 without regard to the justiciable character of the dispute. In addition, if the agreement is governed by the law of this state, it shall be valid and enforceable in accordance with ordinary principles of contract law.

36.454 Application of ORS 36.450 to 36.558; when arbitration or conciliation agreement is international; validity of written agreements.

    (1) ORS 36.450 to 36.558 apply to international commercial arbitration and conciliation, subject to any agreement in force between the United States of America and any other country or countries.
    (2) The provisions of ORS 36.450 to 36.558, except ORS 36.468, 36.470, 36.522 and 36.524, apply only if the place of arbitration or conciliation is within the territory of the State of Oregon.
    (3) An arbitration or conciliation agreement is international if any of the following applies:
        (a) The parties to an arbitration or conciliation agreement have, at the time of the conclusion of that agreement, their places of business in different countries.
        (b) One of the following places is situated outside the country in which the parties have their places of business:
            (A) The place of arbitration or conciliation if determined in, or pursuant to, the arbitration or conciliation agreement.
            (B) Any place where a substantial part of the obligations of the commercial relationship is to be performed.
            (C) The place with which the subject matter of the dispute is most closely connected.
        (c) The parties have expressly agreed that the subject matter of the arbitration or conciliation agreement relates to commercial interests in more than one country.
        (d) The subject matter of the arbitration or conciliation agreement is otherwise related to commercial interests in more than one country.
    (4) For the purposes of subsection (3) of this section:
        (a) If a party has more than one place of business, the place of business is that which has the closest relationship to the arbitration or conciliation agreement; or
        (b) If a party does not have a place of business, reference is to be made to the habitual residence of the party.
    (5) If a written agreement to submit an existing controversy to arbitration or a provision in a written contract to submit to arbitration a controversy thereafter arising between the parties qualifies for arbitration pursuant to this section, that written agreement or provision shall be valid, enforceable and irrevocable, save on such grounds as exist at law or in equity for the revocation of any contract.
    (6) Except as provided in this subsection, ORS 36.450 to 36.558 shall not affect any other law of the State of Oregon by virtue of which certain disputes may not be submitted to arbitration or conciliation or may be submitted to arbitration or conciliation only according to provisions other than those of ORS 36.450 to 36.558. ORS 36.450 to 36.558 supersede ORS 36.100 to 36.425 with respect to international commercial arbitration and conciliation.

    36.456 Construction of ORS 36.450 to 36.558.
    (1) Except as specified in ORS 36.508, where a provision of ORS 36.450 to 36.558 leaves the parties free to determine a certain issue, such freedom includes the right of the parties to authorize a third party, including an institution, to make that determination.
    (2) Where a provision of ORS 36.450 to 36.558 refers to the fact that the parties have agreed or that they may agree or in any other way refers to an agreement of the parties, such agreement includes any arbitration or conciliation rules referred to in that agreement.
    (3) Except as provided in ORS 36.502 (1) and 36.516 (2)(a), where a provision of ORS 36.450 to 36.558 refers to a claim, it also applies to a counterclaim, and where it refers to a defense, it also applies to a defense of a counterclaim.

36.458 When written communication considered to have been received.
   
(1) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties: (a) Any written communication is considered to have been received if it is delivered to the addressee personally or if it is delivered at the place of business, habitual residence or mailing address of the addressee. If none of these can be found after making a reasonable inquiry, a written communication is considered to have been received if it is sent to the addressee’s last-known place of business, habitual residence or mailing address by registered letter or by any other means which provides a record of the attempt to deliver it; and (b) The communication is considered to have been received on the day it is so delivered.
    (2) The provisions of this section do not apply to communications in court proceedings.

36.460 Waiver of objection to arbitration.

    (1) A party who knows that any provision of ORS 36.450 to 36.558 or of any requirement under the arbitration agreement that has not been complied with and yet proceeds with the arbitration without stating an objection to such noncompliance without undue delay or, if a time limit is provided for stating that objection, within that period of time, shall be deemed to have waived the right to object.
    (2) For purposes of subsection (1) of this section, “any provision of ORS 36.450 to 36.558” means any provision of ORS 36.450 to 36.558 in respect of which the parties may otherwise agree.

36.462 Prohibition on intervention by court.
In matters governed by ORS 36.450 to 36.558, no court shall intervene except where so provided in ORS 36.450 to 36.558 or in applicable federal law.

36.464 Venue.
    (1) The functions referred to in ORS 36.468 and 36.470 shall be performed by the circuit court in:
        (a) The county where the arbitration agreement is to be performed or was made.
        (b) If the arbitration agreement does not specify a county where the agreement is to be performed and the agreement was not made in any county in the State of Oregon, the county where any party to the court proceeding resides or has a place of business.
        (c) In any case not covered by paragraph (a) or (b) of this subsection, in any county in the State of Oregon.
    (2) All other functions assigned by ORS 36.450 to 36.558 to the circuit court shall be performed by the circuit court of the county in which the place of arbitration is located.

36.466 Arbitration agreements to be in writing.

    The arbitration agreement shall be in writing. An agreement is in writing if it is contained in a document signed by the parties or in an exchange of letters, telex, telegrams or other means of telecommunication which provides a record of the agreement, or in an exchange of statements of claim and defense in which the existence of an agreement is alleged by one party and not denied by another. The reference in a contract to a document containing an arbitration clause constitutes an arbitration agreement provided that the contract is in writing and the reference is such as to make that clause a part of the contract.

36.468 Application to stay judicial proceedings and compel arbitration.

    (1) When a party to an international commercial arbitration agreement commences judicial proceedings seeking relief with respect to a matter covered by the agreement to arbitrate, the court shall, if a party so requests not later than when submitting the party’s first statement on the substance of the dispute, stay the proceedings and refer the parties to arbitration unless it finds that the agreement is null and void, inoperative or incapable of being performed.
    (2) Arbitral proceedings may begin or continue, and an award may be made, while a judicial proceeding described in subsection (1) of this section is pending before the court.
    (3) A court may not, without a request from a party made pursuant to subsection (1) of this section, refer the parties to arbitration.

36.470 Interim judicial relief; factors considered by court; determination of arbitral tribunal’s jurisdiction.
    (1) It is not incompatible with an arbitration agreement for a party to request from a court, before or during arbitral proceedings, an interim measure of protection or for the court to grant such a measure.
    (2) Any party to an arbitration governed by ORS 36.450 to 36.558 may request from the circuit court the enforcement of an order of an arbitral tribunal granting an interim measure of protection pursuant to ORS 36.486. Enforcement shall be granted pursuant to the law applicable to the granting of the type of interim relief requested.
    (3) Measures which the circuit court may grant in connection with a pending arbitration include, but are not limited to:
        (a) An order of attachment issued to assure that the award to which the applicant may be entitled is not rendered ineffectual by the dissipation of party assets.
        (b) A preliminary injunction granted in order to protect trade secrets or to conserve goods which are the subject matter of the arbitral dispute.
    (4) In considering a request for interim relief, the court, subject to subsection (5) of this section, shall give preclusive effect to any and all findings of fact of the arbitral tribunal, including the probable validity of the claim which is the subject of the award for interim relief that the arbitral tribunal has previously granted in the proceeding in question, provided that such interim award is consistent with public policy.
    (5) Where the arbitral tribunal has not ruled on an objection to its jurisdiction, the court shall not grant preclusive effect to the tribunal’s findings until the court has made an independent finding as to the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal. If the court rules that the arbitral tribunal did not have jurisdiction, the application for interim measures of relief shall be denied. Such a ruling by the court that the arbitral tribunal lacks jurisdiction is not binding on the arbitral tribunal or subsequent judicial proceedings.

36.472 Number of arbitrators.
    The parties may agree on the number of arbitrators. If the parties do not agree, the number of arbitrators shall be one.

36.474 Procedure for appointment of arbitrators; appointment by circuit court.    
    (1) No person shall be precluded by reason of nationality from acting as an arbitrator unless otherwise agreed by the parties.
    (2) The parties may agree on a procedure for appointing the arbitrator or arbitrators, subject to the provisions of subsections (4), (5) and (6) of this section.
    (3) If the parties do not agree on a procedure for appointing the arbitrator or arbitrators:
        (a) In an arbitration with two parties and involving three or more arbitrators, each party shall appoint one arbitrator and the appointed arbitrators shall appoint the remaining arbitrators. If a party fails to appoint an arbitrator within 30 days of receipt of a request to do so from the other party or parties, or if the two appointed arbitrators fail to agree on the remaining arbitrators within 30 days of their appointment, then, upon the request of any party, the circuit court shall make the appointment.
        (b) In an arbitration with more than two parties or in an arbitration with two parties involving fewer than three arbitrators, then, upon the request of any party, the arbitrator or arbitrators shall be appointed by the circuit court.
    (4) Unless the parties’ agreement on the appointment procedure provides other means for securing the appointment, any party may request the circuit court to make the appointment if there is an appointment procedure agreed upon by the parties and if:
        (a) A party fails to act as required under such procedure;
        (b) The parties, or the appointed arbitrators, are unable to reach an agreement as expected of them under such procedure; or
        (c) A third party, including an institution, fails to perform any function entrusted to it under such procedure.
    (5) A decision by the circuit court on a matter entrusted to it by subsection (3) or (4) of this section shall be final and not subject to appeal.
    (6) The circuit court, in appointing an arbitrator, shall have due regard to all of the following:
        (a) Any qualifications required of the arbitrator by the agreement of the parties;
        (b) Other considerations as are likely to secure the appointment of an independent and impartial arbitrator; and
        (c) The advisability of appointing an arbitrator of a nationality other than those of the parties.

36.476 Disclosure by proposed arbitrators and conciliators; waiver of disclosure; grounds for challenge.
    (1) Except as otherwise provided in ORS 36.450 to 36.558, all persons whose names have been submitted for consideration for appointment or designation as arbitrators or conciliators, or who have been appointed or designated as such, shall, within 15 days, make a disclosure to the parties of any information which might cause their impartiality to be questioned including, but not limited to, any of the following instances:
        (a) The person has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party or personal knowledge of the disputed evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding.
        (b) The person served as a lawyer in the matter in controversy, or the person is or has been associated with another who has participated in the matter during such association, or the person has been a material witness concerning it.
        (c) The person served as an arbitrator or conciliator in another proceeding involving one or more of the parties to the proceeding.
        (d) The person, individually or as a fiduciary, or the person’s spouse or minor child, or anyone residing in the person’s household, has a financial interest in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding, or any other interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding.
        (e) The person, the person’s spouse or minor child, anyone residing in the person’s household, any individual within the third degree of relationship to any of them, or the spouse of any of them, meets any of the following conditions:
            (A) The person is or has been a party to the proceeding, or an officer, director or trustee of a party.
            (B) The person is acting or has acted as a lawyer in the proceeding.
            (C) The person is known to have an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding.
            (D) The person is likely to be a material witness in the proceeding.
        (f) The person has a close personal or professional relationship with a person who meets any of the following conditions:
            (A) The person is or has been a party to the proceeding, or an officer, director or trustee of a party.
            (B) The person is acting or has acted as a lawyer or representative in the proceeding.
            (C) The person is or expects to be nominated as an arbitrator or conciliator in the proceedings.
            (D) The person is known to have an interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding.
            (E) The person is likely to be a material witness in the proceeding.
    (2) The obligation to disclose information set forth in subsection (1) of this section is mandatory and cannot be waived by the parties with respect to persons serving either as the sole arbitrator or sole conciliator or as one of two arbitrators or conciliators or as the chief or prevailing arbitrator or conciliator. The parties may otherwise agree to waive such disclosure.
    (3) From the time of appointment and throughout the arbitral proceedings, an arbitrator shall, without delay, disclose to the parties any circumstances referred to in subsection (1) of this section which were not previously disclosed.
    (4) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties or allowed by the rules governing the arbitration, an arbitrator may be challenged only if circumstances exist that give rise to justifiable doubts as to the independence or impartiality of the arbitrator, or as to possession of the qualifications upon which the parties have agreed.
    (5) A party may challenge an arbitrator appointed by it, or in whose appointment it has participated, only for reasons of which it becomes aware after the appointment has been made.

36.478 Procedure for challenging arbitrator.
    (1) Subject to subsection (4)(a) of this section, the parties may agree on a procedure for challenging an arbitrator.
    (2) Failing any agreement referred to in subsection (1) of this section, a party which intends to challenge an arbitrator shall, within 15 days after becoming aware of the constitution of the arbitral tribunal or after becoming aware of any circumstances referred to in ORS 36.476 (4) and (5), whichever shall be later, send a written statement of the reasons for the challenge to the arbitral tribunal.
    (3) Unless the arbitrator challenged under subsection (2) of this section withdraws from office or the other party agrees to the challenge, the arbitral tribunal shall decide the challenge.
    (4)(a) If a challenge under any procedure agreed upon by the parties or under the procedure under subsections (2) and (3) of this section is not successful, the challenging party may request the circuit court, within 30 days after having received notice of the decision rejecting the challenge, to decide on the challenge.
        (b) When the request is made, the circuit court may refuse to decide on the challenge if it is satisfied that, under the procedure agreed upon by the parties, the party making the request had an opportunity to have the challenge decided upon by other than the arbitral tribunal.
        (c) Notwithstanding paragraph (b) of this subsection, whether the challenge is under any procedure agreed upon by the parties or under the procedure under subsections (2) and (3) of this section, if a challenge is based upon the grounds set forth in ORS 36.476 (1), the circuit court shall hear the challenge and, if it determines that the facts support a finding that such ground or grounds fairly exist, then the challenge shall be sustained.
    (5) The decision of the circuit court under subsection (4) of this section is final and not subject to appeal.
    (6) While a request under subsection (4) of this section is pending, the arbitral tribunal, including the challenged arbitrator, may continue with the arbitral proceedings and make an arbitral award.

36.480 Withdrawal of arbitrator; termination of mandate.
    (1) If an arbitrator withdraws from the case or if the parties agree on termination because the arbitrator becomes unable, de facto or de jure, to perform the functions of the arbitrator or for other reasons fails to act without undue delay, then the arbitrator’s mandate terminates.
    (2) If a controversy remains concerning any of the grounds referred to in subsection (1) of this section, a party may request the circuit court to decide on the termination of the mandate.
    (3) The decision of the circuit court under subsection (2) of this section is not subject to appeal.
    (4) If, under this section or ORS 36.478 (3), an arbitrator withdraws from office or a party agrees to the termination of the mandate of an arbitrator, this does not imply acceptance of the validity of any ground referred to under this section or under ORS 36.476 (4) and (5).

36.482 Substitute arbitrator; effect of substitution.

    (1) In addition to the circumstances referred to under ORS 36.478 and 36.480, the mandate of an arbitrator terminates upon withdrawal from office for any reason, or by or pursuant to the agreement of the parties.
    (2) Where the mandate of an arbitrator terminates, a substitute arbitrator shall be appointed according to the rules that were applicable to the appointment of the arbitrator being replaced.
    (3) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties:
        (a) Where the number of arbitrators is less than three and an arbitrator is replaced, any hearings previously held shall be repeated.
        (b) Where the presiding arbitrator is replaced, any hearings previously held shall be repeated.
        (c) Where the number of arbitrators is three or more and an arbitrator other than the presiding arbitrator is replaced, any hearings previously held may be repeated at the discretion of the arbitral tribunal.
    (4) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, an order or ruling of the arbitral tribunal made prior to the replacement of an arbitrator under this section is not invalid because there has been a change in the composition of the tribunal.

36.484 Arbitral tribunal may rule on own jurisdiction; time for raising issue of jurisdiction; review by circuit court.

    (1) The arbitral tribunal may rule on its own jurisdiction, including any objections with respect to the existence or validity of the arbitration agreement and, for that purpose, an arbitration clause which forms part of a contract shall be treated as an agreement independent of the other terms of the contract. A decision by the arbitral tribunal that the contract is null and void shall not entail ipso jure the invalidity of the arbitration clause.
    (2) A plea that the arbitral tribunal does not have jurisdiction shall be raised no later than the submission of the statement of defense. However, a party is not precluded from raising such a plea by the fact that the party has appointed, or participated in the appointment of, an arbitrator. A plea that the arbitral tribunal is exceeding the scope of its authority shall be raised as soon as the matter alleged to be beyond the scope of its authority is raised during the arbitral proceedings. In either case, the arbitral tribunal may admit a later plea if it considers the delay justified.
      (3) The arbitral tribunal may rule on a plea referred to in subsection (2) of this section either as a preliminary question or in an award on the merits. If the arbitral tribunal rules as a preliminary question that it has jurisdiction, any party shall request the circuit court, within 30 days after having received notice of that ruling, to decide the matter or shall be deemed to have waived objection to such finding.
    (4) The decision of the circuit court under subsection (3) of this section is not subject to appeal.
    (5) While a request under subsection (3) of this section is pending, the arbitral tribunal may continue with the arbitral proceedings and make an arbitral award.

36.486 Interim measures of protection ordered by arbitral tribunal; security
.
    Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, at the request of a party, the arbitral tribunal may order any party to take such interim measure of protection as the arbitral tribunal may consider necessary in respect to the subject matter of the dispute. The arbitral tribunal may require any party to provide appropriate security in connection with such measure.

36.488 Fairness in proceedings
.
    The parties shall be treated with equality and each party shall be given a full opportunity to present the case of the party.

36.490 Procedures subject to agreement by parties; procedure in absence of agreement.

    (1) Subject to the provisions of ORS 36.450 to 36.558, the parties are free to agree on the procedure to be followed by the arbitral tribunal in conducting the proceedings.
    (2) If the parties fail to agree, subject to the provisions of ORS 36.450 to 36.558, the arbitral tribunal may conduct the arbitration in such a manner as it considers appropriate.
    (3) The power of the arbitral tribunal under subsection (2) of this section includes the power to determine the admissibility, relevance, materiality and weight of any evidence.

36.492 Place of arbitration.

    (1) The parties are free to agree on the place of arbitration. If the parties do not agree, the place of arbitration shall be determined by the arbitral tribunal or, if any members of the arbitral tribunal are not yet appointed and are to be appointed by the circuit court as pursuant to ORS 36.474 (4), by the Chief Justice, taking into account the circumstances of the case, including the convenience of the parties.
    (2) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1) of this section, unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitral tribunal may meet at any place it considers appropriate for consultation among its members, for hearing witnesses, experts or the parties, or for the inspection of documents, goods or other property.

36.494 Commencement of arbitral proceedings.
    Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitral proceedings in respect to a particular dispute commence on the date which a request for referral of that dispute to arbitration is received by the respondent.

36.496 Language used in proceedings.
    (1) The parties are free to agree on the language or languages to be used in the arbitral proceedings. If the parties do not agree, the arbitral tribunal shall determine the language or languages to be used in the proceedings. Unless otherwise specified therein, this agreement or determination shall apply to any written statement by a party, any hearing and any award, decision or other communication by the arbitral tribunal.
    (2) The arbitral tribunal may order that any documentary evidence shall be accompanied by a translation into the language or languages agreed upon by the parties or determined by the arbitral tribunal.

36.498 Contents of statements by claimant and respondent; amendment or supplement
.
    (1) Within the period of time agreed upon by the parties or determined by the arbitral tribunal, the claimant shall state the facts supporting the claim of the claimant, the points at issue, and the relief or remedy sought, and the respondent shall state the defense of the respondent in respect of these particulars, unless the parties have otherwise agreed as to the required elements of those statements.
    (2) The parties may submit with their statements all documents they consider to be relevant or may add a reference to the documents or other evidence they will submit.
    (3) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, either party may amend or supplement the claim or defense of the party during the course of the arbitral proceedings, unless the arbitral tribunal considers it inappropriate to allow the amendment or supplement having regard to the delay in making it.

36.500 Oral hearing; notice; discovery.
    (1) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitral tribunal shall decide whether to hold oral hearings for the presentation of evidence or for oral argument or whether the proceedings shall be conducted on the basis of documents and other materials.
    (2) Unless the parties have agreed that no oral hearings shall be held, the arbitral tribunal shall hold oral hearings at an appropriate stage of the proceedings, if so requested by a party.
    (3) The parties shall be given sufficient advance notice of any hearing and of any meeting of the arbitral tribunal for the purpose of the inspection of documents, goods or other property.
    (4) All statements, documents or other information supplied to, or applications made to, the arbitral tribunal by one party shall be communicated to the other party. Any expert report or evidentiary document on which the arbitral tribunal may rely in making its decision shall be communicated to the parties.
    (5) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, all oral hearings and meetings in arbitral proceedings shall be held in camera.

36.502 Effect of failure to make required statement or to appear at oral hearing.
    (1) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, where, without showing sufficient cause, the claimant fails to communicate the statement of claim of the claimant in accordance with ORS 36.498 (1) and (2), the arbitral tribunal shall terminate the proceedings.
    (2) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, where, without showing sufficient cause, the respondent fails to communicate the statement of defense of the respondent in accordance with ORS 36.498 (1) and (2), the arbitral tribunal shall continue the proceedings without treating that failure in itself as an admission of the claimant’s allegations.
    (3) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, where, without showing sufficient cause, a party fails to appear at an oral hearing or to produce documentary evidence, the arbitral tribunal may continue with the proceedings and make the arbitral award on the evidence before it.

36.504 Appointment of experts.

    (1) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitral tribunal may appoint one or more experts to report to it on specific issues to be determined by the arbitral tribunal and require a party to give the expert any relevant information or to produce, or to provide access to, any relevant documents, goods or other property for the expert’s inspection.
    (2) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, if a party so requests or if the arbitral tribunal considers it necessary, the expert shall, after delivery of the expert’s written or oral report, participate in an oral hearing where the parties have the opportunity to question the expert and to present expert witnesses on the points at issue.

36.506 Circuit court assistance in taking evidence; circuit court authorized to enter certain orders upon application.

    (1) The arbitral tribunal, or a party with the approval of the arbitral tribunal, may request from the circuit court assistance in taking evidence and the court may execute the request within its competence and according to its rules on taking evidence. In addition, a subpoena may be issued as provided in ORCP 55, in which case the witness compensation provisions of ORS chapter 44 shall apply.
    (2) When the parties to two or more arbitration agreements have agreed in their respective arbitration agreements or otherwise, the circuit court may, on application by one party with the consent of all other parties to those arbitration agreements, do one or more of the following:
        (a) Order the arbitration proceedings arising out of those arbitration agreements to be consolidated on terms the court considers just and necessary.
        (b) Where all the parties cannot agree on an arbitral tribunal for the consolidated arbitration, appoint an arbitral tribunal in accordance with ORS 36.474 (6).
        (c) Where the parties cannot agree on any other matter necessary to conduct the consolidated arbitration, make any other order it considers necessary.
        (d) Order the arbitration proceedings arising out of those arbitration agreements to be held at the same time or one immediately after another.
        (e) Order any of the arbitration proceedings arising out of those arbitration agreements to be stayed until the determination of any other of them.
    (3) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent the parties to two or more arbitrations from agreeing to consolidate those arbitrations and taking any steps that are necessary to effect that consolidation.

36.508 Choice of laws.
    (1) The arbitral tribunal shall decide the dispute in accordance with the rules of law designated by the parties as applicable to the substance of the dispute.
    (2) Any designation by the parties of the law or legal system of a given country or political subdivision thereof shall be construed, unless otherwise expressed, as directly referring to the substantive law of that state and not to its conflict of laws rules.
    (3) Failing any designation of the law under subsection (1) of this section by the parties, the arbitral tribunal shall apply the rules of law it considers to be appropriate given all the circumstances surrounding the dispute.
    (4) The arbitral tribunal shall decide ex aequo et bono or as amiable compositeur if the parties have expressly authorized it to do so.
    (5) In all cases, the arbitral tribunal shall decide in accordance with the terms of the contract and shall take into account the usages of the trade applicable to the transaction.

36.510 Decision of arbitral tribunal.
   
Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, any decision of the arbitral tribunal in arbitral proceedings with more than one arbitrator shall be made by a majority of all its members. However, the parties or all members of the arbitral tribunal may authorize a presiding arbitrator to decide questions of procedure.
 
36.512 Settlement.
    (1) It is not incompatible with an arbitration agreement for an arbitral tribunal to encourage settlement of the dispute and, with the agreement of the parties, the arbitral tribunal may use mediation, conciliation or other procedures at any time during the arbitral proceedings to encourage settlement. If agreed by the parties, the members of the arbitral tribunal are not disqualified from resuming their roles as arbitrators by reason of the mediation, conciliation or other procedure.
    (2) If, during the arbitral proceedings, the parties settle the dispute, the arbitral tribunal shall terminate the proceedings and, if requested by the parties and not objected to by the arbitral tribunal, record the settlement in the form of an arbitral award on agreed terms.
    (3) An arbitral award on agreed terms shall be made in accordance with ORS 36.514 and shall state that it is an arbitral award.
    (4) An arbitral award on agreed terms has the same status and effect as any other arbitral award on the substance of the dispute.

36.514 Arbitral award; contents; interim award; award for costs of arbitration.
    (1) The arbitral award shall be made in writing and shall be signed by the arbitrator or arbitrators. In arbitral proceedings with more than one arbitrator, the signatures of the majority of all the members of the arbitral tribunal shall suffice so long as the reason for any omitted signature is stated.
    (2) The arbitral award shall state the reasons upon which it is based, unless the parties have agreed that no reasons are to be given or the award is an arbitral award on agreed terms under ORS 36.512.
    (3) The arbitral award shall state its date and the place of arbitration as determined in accordance with ORS 36.492 (1) and the award shall be considered to have been made at that place.
    (4) After the arbitral award is made, a copy signed by the arbitrators in accordance with subsection (1) of this section shall be delivered to each party.
    (5) The arbitral tribunal may, at any time during the arbitral proceedings, make an interim arbitral award on any matter with respect to which it may make a final arbitral award. The interim award may be enforced in the same manner as a final arbitral award.
    (6) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the arbitral tribunal may award interest.
    (7)(a) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the costs of an arbitration shall be at the discretion of the arbitral tribunal.
        (b) In making an order for costs, the arbitral tribunal may include as costs any of the following:
            (A) The fees and expenses of the arbitrators and expert witnesses.
            (B) Legal fees and expenses.
            (C) Any administration fees of the institution supervising the arbitration, if any.
            (D) Any other expenses incurred in connection with the arbitral proceedings.
        (c) In making an order for costs, the arbitral tribunal may specify any of the following:
            (A) The party entitled to costs.
            (B) The party who shall pay the costs.
            (C) The amount of costs or the method of determining that amount.
            (D) The manner in which the costs shall be paid.

36.516 Termination of arbitral proceedings.

    (1) The arbitral proceedings are terminated by the final arbitral award or by an order of the arbitral tribunal in accordance with subsection (2) of this section. The award shall be final upon the expiration of the applicable periods in ORS 36.518.
    (2) The arbitral tribunal shall issue an order for the termination of the arbitral proceedings when:
        (a) The claimant withdraws the claim, unless the respondent objects thereto and the arbitral tribunal recognizes a legitimate interest on the part of the respondent in obtaining a final settlement of the dispute;
        (b) The parties agree on the termination of the proceedings; or
        (c) The arbitral tribunal finds that the continuation of the proceedings has for any other reason become unnecessary or impossible.
    (3) Subject to ORS 36.518 and 36.520 (4), the mandate of the arbitral tribunal terminates with the termination of the arbitral proceeding.

36.518 Correction of errors in award; interpretation of award; additional award.
    (1) Within 30 days of receipt of the arbitral award, unless another period of time has been agreed upon by the parties:
        (a) A party, with notice to the other party, may request the arbitral tribunal to correct in the award any errors in computation, clerical or typographical errors, or errors of similar nature; and
        (b) A party may, if agreed by the parties, request the arbitral tribunal to give an interpretation of a specific point or part of the arbitral award.
    (2) If the arbitral tribunal considers any request made under subsection (1) of this section to be justified, it shall make the correction or give the interpretation within 30 days of the receipt of the request. The interpretation shall form part of the arbitral award.
    (3) The arbitral tribunal may correct any error of the type referred to in subsection (1)(a) of this section on its own initiative within 30 days of the date of the award.
    (4) Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, a party, with notice to the other party, may request, within 30 days of receipt of the award, the arbitral tribunal to make an additional award as to claims presented in the arbitral proceedings but omitted from the award. If the arbitral tribunal considers the request to be justified, it shall make the additional award within 60 days.
    (5) If necessary, the arbitral tribunal may extend the period of time within which it shall make a correction, interpretation or an additional award under subsection (1) or (4) of this section.
    (6) The provisions of ORS 36.514 shall apply to a correction or interpretation of the award or to an additional award.

36.520 Setting aside award; grounds; time for application; circuit court fees.

    (1) Recourse to a court against an arbitral award may only be by an application for setting aside in accordance with subsections (2) and (3) of this section.
    (2) An arbitral award may be set aside by the circuit court only if:
        (a) The party making application furnishes proof that:
            (A) A party to the arbitration agreement referred to in ORS 36.466 was under some incapacity or that the agreement is not valid under the law to which the parties have subjected it or, failing any indication thereon, under the laws of the State of Oregon or the United States;
            (B) The party making the application was not given proper notice of the appointment of an arbitrator or of the arbitral proceedings or was otherwise unable to present the party’s case;
            (C) The award deals with a dispute not contemplated by or not falling within the terms of the submission to arbitration or contains decisions on matters beyond the scope of the submission to arbitration, provided that, if the decisions on matters not submitted to arbitration can be separated from those not so submitted, only that part of the award which contains decisions on matters not submitted to arbitration may be set aside; or
            (D) The composition of the arbitral tribunal or the arbitral procedure was not in accordance with the agreement of the parties, unless such agreement was in conflict with a provision of ORS 36.450 to 36.558 from which the parties cannot derogate, or, failing such agreement, was not in accordance with ORS 36.450 to 36.558; or
        (b) The circuit court finds that:
            (A) The subject matter of the dispute is not capable of settlement by arbitration under the laws of the State of Oregon or of the United States; or
            (B) The award is in conflict with the public policy of the State of Oregon or of the United States.
    (3) An application for setting aside may not be made after three months have elapsed from the date on which the party making that application had received the award or, if a request had been made under ORS 36.518, from the date on which that request had been disposed of by the arbitral tribunal.
    (4) The circuit court, when asked to set aside an arbitral award, may, where appropriate and so requested by a party, suspend the setting aside proceedings for a period of time determined by it in order to give the arbitral tribunal an opportunity to resume the arbitral proceedings or to take such other action as in the arbitral tribunal’s opinion will eliminate the grounds for setting aside.
    (5) The clerk of the circuit court shall collect from the party making application for setting aside under subsection (1) of this section a filing fee of $39 and from a party filing an appearance in opposition to the application a filing fee of $39. However, if the application relates to an arbitral award made following an application or request to a circuit court under any section of ORS 36.450 to 36.558 in respect to which the parties have paid filing fees under ORS 21.110, filing fees shall not be collected under this subsection. An application for setting aside or an appearance in opposition thereto shall not be deemed filed unless the fee required by this subsection is paid by the filing party.

36.522 Enforcement of award; procedure; fee; entry of judgment.
    (1) An arbitral award, irrespective of the country in which it was made, shall be recognized as binding and, upon application in writing to the circuit court, shall be enforced subject to the provisions of this section and ORS 36.524.
    (2) The party relying on an award or applying for its enforcement shall supply the authenticated original or a certified copy of the award and the original or certified copy of the arbitration agreement referred to in ORS 36.466. If the award or agreement is not made in the English language, then the party relying on the award or applying for its enforcement shall supply a duly certified translation thereof into the English language.
    (3) The party relying on an arbitral award or applying for its enforcement shall deliver to the clerk of the circuit court the documents specified in subsection (2) of this section along with proof of the delivery of a copy of the arbitral award as required by ORS 36.514 (4). The relying party shall pay to the clerk a filing fee of $25, after which the clerk shall enter the arbitral award of record in the office of the clerk. If no application to set aside is filed against the arbitral award as provided in ORS 36.520 within the time specified in ORS 36.520 (3) or, if such an application is filed, the relying party after the disposition of the application indicates the intention to still rely on the award or to apply for its enforcement, judgment shall be entered as upon the verdict of a jury, and execution may issue thereon, and the same proceedings may be had upon the award with like effect as upon a verdict in a civil action.

36.524 Grounds for refusal to enforce award; fee.

    (1) Recognition or enforcement of an arbitral award, irrespective of the country in which it was made, may be refused only:
        (a) At the request of the party against whom it is invoked, if that party pays the clerk of the circuit court a filing fee of $25 and furnishes to the court where recognition or enforcement is sought proof that:
            (A) A party to the arbitration agreement referred to in ORS 36.466 was under some incapacity or that the agreement is not valid under the law to which the parties have subjected it or under the law of the country where the award was made;
            (B) The party against whom the award is invoked was not given proper notice of the appointment of an arbitrator or of the arbitral proceedings or was otherwise unable to present the party’s case;
            (C) The arbitral award deals with a dispute not contemplated by or not falling within the terms of the submission to arbitration or the award contains decisions on matters beyond the scope of the submission to arbitration, provided that, if the decisions on matters submitted to arbitration can be separated from those not so submitted, that part of the award which contains decisions on matters submitted to arbitration may be recognized and enforced;
            (D) The composition of the arbitral tribunal or the arbitral procedure was not in accordance with the agreement of the parties or, failing such agreement, was not in accordance with the law of the country where the arbitration took place; or
            (E) The award has not yet become binding on the parties or has been set aside or suspended by a court of the country in which, or under the law of which, that award was made; or
        (b) If the court finds that:
            (A) The subject matter of the dispute is not capable of settlement by arbitration under the laws of the State of Oregon or of the United States; or
            (B) The recognition or enforcement of the arbitral award would be contrary to the public policy of the State of Oregon or of the United States.
    (2) If an application for setting aside or suspension of an award has been made to the court referred to in subsection (1)(a)(E) of this section, and if it considers it proper, the court where recognition or enforcement is sought may adjourn its decision on application of the party claiming recognition or enforcement of the award. The court may also order the other party to provide appropriate security.

36.526 Provisions to be interpreted in good faith.

    In construing ORS 36.454 to 36.524, a court or arbitral tribunal shall interpret those sections in good faith, in accordance with the ordinary meaning to be given to their terms in their context, and in light of their objects and purposes. Recourse may be had for these purposes, in addition to aids in interpretation ordinarily available under the laws of this state, to the documents of the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law and its working group respecting the preparation of the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration and shall give those documents the weight that is appropriate in the circumstances.

36.528 Policy to encourage conciliation.

    It is the policy of the State of Oregon to encourage parties to an international commercial agreement or transaction which qualifies for arbitration or conciliation pursuant to ORS 36.454 (3) to resolve disputes arising from such agreements or transactions through conciliation. The parties may select or permit an arbitral tribunal or other third party to select one or more persons to service as the conciliator or conciliators who shall assist the parties in an independent and impartial manner in their attempt to reach an amicable settlement of their dispute.

36.530 Guiding principles of conciliators.

    The conciliator or conciliators shall be guided by principles of objectivity, fairness and justice, giving consideration to, among other things, the rights and obligations of the parties, the usages of the trade concerned and the circumstances surrounding the dispute, including any previous practices between the parties. 

36.532 Manner of conducting conciliation proceedings.

    The conciliator or conciliators may conduct the conciliation proceedings in such a manner as they consider appropriate, taking into account the circumstances of the case, the wishes of the parties and the desirability of a speedy settlement of the dispute. Except as otherwise provided in ORS 36.450 to 36.558, no provision of the Oregon Rules of Civil Procedure nor any other provision of the Oregon Revised Statutes governing procedural matters shall apply to any conciliation proceeding brought under ORS 36.450 to 36.558.

36.534 Draft conciliation settlement.
    (1) At any time during the proceedings, the conciliator or conciliators may prepare a draft conciliation settlement which may include the assessment and apportionment of costs between the parties and send copies to the parties, specifying the time within which the parties must signify their approval.
    (2) No party may be required to accept any settlement proposed by the conciliator or conciliators.

36.536 Prohibition on use of statements, admissions or documents arising out of conciliation proceedings.

    When the parties agree to participate in conciliation under ORS 36.450 to 36.558:
    (1) Evidence of anything said or of any admission made in the course of the conciliation is not admissible in evidence and disclosure of any such evidence shall not be compelled in any civil action in which, pursuant to law, testimony may be compelled to be given. However, this subsection does not limit the admissibility of evidence if all parties participating in conciliation consent, in writing, to its disclosure, provided that such consent is given after the statement or admission to be disclosed is made in the conciliation proceeding.
    (2) In the event that any such evidence is offered in contravention of this section, the arbitration tribunal or the court shall make any order which it considers to be appropriate to deal with the matter, including, without limitation, orders restricting the introduction of evidence, or dismissing the case without prejudice.
    (3) Unless the document otherwise provides, no document prepared for the purpose of, or in the course of, or pursuant to, the conciliation, or any copy thereof, is admissible in evidence and disclosure of any such document shall not be compelled in any arbitration or civil action in which, pursuant to law, testimony may be compelled to be given. 

36.538 Conciliation to act as stay of other proceedings; tolling of limitation periods during conciliation.

    (1) The agreement of the parties to submit a dispute to conciliation shall be deemed an agreement between or among those parties to stay all judicial or arbitral proceedings from the commencement of conciliation until the termination of conciliation proceedings.
    (2) All applicable limitation periods, including periods of prescription, shall be tolled or extended upon the commencement of conciliation proceedings to conciliate a dispute under ORS 36.450 to 36.558 and all limitation periods shall remain tolled and periods of prescription extended as to all parties to the conciliation proceedings until the 10th day following the termination of conciliation proceedings.
    (3) For purposes of this section, conciliation proceedings are deemed to have commenced as soon as:
        (a) A party has requested conciliation of a particular dispute or disputes; and
        (b) The other party or parties agree to participate in the conciliation proceeding.

36.540 Termination of conciliation proceedings.

    (1) The conciliation proceedings may be terminated as to all parties by any of the following:
        (a) A written declaration of the conciliator or conciliators, after consultation with the parties, to the effect that further efforts at conciliation are no longer justified, on the date of the declaration.
        (b) A written declaration of the parties addressed to the conciliator or conciliators to the effect that the conciliation proceedings are terminated, on the date of the declaration.
        (c) The signing of a settlement agreement by all of the parties, on the date of the agreement.
    (2) The conciliation proceedings may be terminated as to particular parties by either of the following:
        (a) A written declaration of a party to the other party or parties and the conciliator or conciliators, if appointed, to the effect that the conciliation proceedings shall be terminated as to that particular party, on the date of the declaration.
        (b) The signing of a settlement agreement by some of the parties, on the date of the agreement.

36.542 Conciliator not to be arbitrator or take part in arbitral or judicial proceedings.

    No person who has served as conciliator may be appointed as an arbitrator for, or take part in, any arbitral or judicial proceedings in the same dispute unless all parties manifest their consent to such participation or the rules adopted for conciliation or arbitration otherwise provide.

36.544 Submission to conciliation not waiver.
    By submitting to conciliation, no party shall be deemed to have waived any rights or remedies which that party would have had if conciliation had not been initiated, other than those set forth in any settlement agreement which results from the conciliation. 

36.546 Conciliation agreement to be treated as arbitral award.
   
If the conciliation succeeds in settling the dispute and the result of the conciliation is reduced to writing and signed by the conciliator or conciliators and the parties or their representatives, the written agreement shall be treated as an arbitral award rendered by an arbitral tribunal duly constituted in and pursuant to the laws of this state and shall have the same force and effect as a final award in arbitration.

36.548 Costs of conciliation proceedings.
    Upon termination of the conciliation proceedings, the conciliator or conciliators shall fix the costs of the conciliation and give written notice thereof to the parties. As used in this section and in ORS 36.550, “costs” includes only the following:
    (1) A reasonable fee to be paid to the conciliator or conciliators.
    (2) The travel and other reasonable expenses of the conciliator or conciliators.
    (3) The travel and other reasonable expenses of witnesses requested by the conciliator or conciliators with the consent of the parties.
    (4) The cost of any expert advice requested by the conciliator or conciliators with the consent of the parties.
    (5) The cost of any court.

36.550 Payment of costs.
    The costs fixed by the conciliator or conciliators as pursuant to ORS 36.548 shall be borne equally by the parties unless the settlement agreement provides for a different apportionment. All other expenses incurred by a party shall be borne by that party.

36.552 Effect of conciliation on jurisdiction of courts.
    Neither the request for conciliation, the consent to participate in the conciliation proceeding, the participation in such proceedings, nor the entering into a conciliation agreement or settlement, shall be deemed as consent to the jurisdiction of any court in this state in the event conciliation fails.

36.554 Immunities.
    (1) Neither the arbitrator or arbitrators, the conciliator or conciliators, the parties, nor their representatives, shall be subject to service of process on any civil matter while they are present in this state for the purpose of arranging for or participating in any arbitration or conciliation proceedings subject to ORS 36.450 to 36.558.
    (2) No person who serves as an arbitrator or as a conciliator shall be held liable in an action for damages resulting from any act or omission in the performance of their role as an arbitrator or as a conciliator in any proceeding subject to ORS 36.450 to 36.558.

36.556 Severability.
    If any provision of ORS 36.450 to 36.558 or its application to any person or circumstance is held to be invalid, the invalidity does not affect the other provisions or applications of ORS 36.450 to 36.558 which can be given effect without the invalid provision or application and to this end the provisions of ORS 36.450 to 36.558 are severable.

36.558 Short title.
    ORS 36.450 to 36.558 shall be known and may be cited as the “Oregon International Commercial Arbitration and Conciliation Act.”